Research and Publication Misconduct Policy

Renaissance of Universal Mind · RUM PUBLISHING GROUP MCHJ

1. Forms of misconduct

Concerns include fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, undisclosed text recycling, duplicate publication, citation manipulation, fabricated peer review, authorship manipulation, undeclared conflicts, unethical research and deceptive image or data processing. The journal considers the evidence and scientific impact rather than treating every error as intentional misconduct.

2. Initial assessment and author response

A report should identify the manuscript or article and specific evidence. A non-conflicted editor checks whether the concern is credible, preserves relevant material and seeks a focused explanation from the author. Confidentiality and fair treatment apply to both the complainant and the author. Screening software, AI detectors and anonymous allegations are signals to assess, not conclusive findings.

3. Independent and institutional investigation

Publication or review may be paused while serious issues are unresolved. Independent expertise may be needed for technical questions. An institution, funder or other competent body may be contacted where original data, laboratory records, participant protection or alleged conduct cannot be adequately investigated by the journal. Share only relevant information and document the reasons; do not threaten institutional referral to obtain citations or payment.

4. Proportionate outcomes and appeals

Documented outcomes may include no further action, clarification, revision, rejection, a published correction, an expression of concern or retraction. Findings should distinguish established facts from unresolved questions and consider the author’s response. A submission restriction must not be presented as an automatic penalty without a fair, documented decision. Authors may use the complaints and appeals route.

Related policies and information

Editorial office: editor@rum-journal.com.